Ask the investment question instead of assuming the investor
"I want to invest" on the front page presumed the visitor's intent. /invest now asks it from their side - "How do we invest in uhhm?" - and speaks to what a capital manager is actually accountable for: reasons. The front page keeps only a light gateway; the question nav surfaces /invest (like every other qualifying question) from anywhere, so no concern depends on front-page space. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Sonnet 5
parent
251fe22c25
commit
c6d82199be
+5
-24
@@ -64,31 +64,12 @@ alternatives:
|
||||
label: Email
|
||||
type: email
|
||||
|
||||
- name: I want to invest
|
||||
- name: Managing capital?
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
We grow deliberately — distributed communication architecture,
|
||||
built to last. If that's where you want your capital working,
|
||||
let's talk.
|
||||
action: /invested
|
||||
consequence: [Open the conversation]
|
||||
record_as: investors
|
||||
encouragements:
|
||||
- Serious inquiries get a serious answer.
|
||||
features:
|
||||
- name: Who are you?
|
||||
description: ""
|
||||
requirements:
|
||||
- name: name
|
||||
label: Name
|
||||
- name: email
|
||||
label: Email
|
||||
type: email
|
||||
- name: What brings you here?
|
||||
description: ""
|
||||
requirements:
|
||||
- name: motivation
|
||||
label: Why redoal, and what are you looking for?
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
Then you're accountable for reasons, not enthusiasm. Ours are
|
||||
written down — qualities you can test against your own.
|
||||
action: /invest
|
||||
consequence: [How do we invest in uhhm?]
|
||||
|
||||
- name: I want in
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
id: /invest
|
||||
route: ^/invest
|
||||
name: How do we invest in uhhm?
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
If you manage capital, enthusiasm isn't a reason — you're accountable
|
||||
for the qualities an investment actually has. Here are ours, written
|
||||
down, and the shortest path to testing them against your own.
|
||||
alternatives:
|
||||
- name: What a good investment should be able to show
|
||||
description: ""
|
||||
features:
|
||||
- name: State you can audit
|
||||
icon: lucide:git-commit-horizontal
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Every applicant, client, project, and investor here is
|
||||
tracked state with a durable event history — not a
|
||||
spreadsheet someone remembers to update. What we claim about
|
||||
the organisation, the system can show.
|
||||
- name: A focus that doesn't wander
|
||||
icon: lucide:compass
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Distributed communication architecture is the mandate. Work
|
||||
that doesn't serve it doesn't get taken on — including work
|
||||
that pays.
|
||||
- name: Growth by dialogue, not headcount
|
||||
icon: lucide:messages-square
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
People, clients, and changes to the system itself all arrive
|
||||
through the same deliberate, reviewable loop. Slow on
|
||||
purpose, cheap to run, hard to bloat.
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Test us
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
A few lines about what you're looking for opens the dialogue —
|
||||
commitments only ever follow real conversation.
|
||||
action: /invested
|
||||
consequence: [Open the conversation]
|
||||
record_as: investors
|
||||
encouragements:
|
||||
- Serious inquiries get a serious answer.
|
||||
features:
|
||||
- name: Who are you?
|
||||
description: ""
|
||||
requirements:
|
||||
- name: name
|
||||
label: Name
|
||||
- name: email
|
||||
label: Email
|
||||
type: email
|
||||
- name: What brings you here?
|
||||
description: ""
|
||||
requirements:
|
||||
- name: motivation
|
||||
label: What are you looking for in an investment?
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user