Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Fable 5.1
3dabcf7c58
Two needs about the same record wrote the same page, and the last won. The record's page now holds one form per answering need, under words["forms"][need]. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GT37Z1Xtfd9pUuQtMTg6Yt
44 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Vestmark kommune, planned again by Opus after the September additions
|
||
|
||
`portal-trainer plan --intake intakes/building-permits.yaml --personas
|
||
intakes/building-permits-personas.yaml --llm "MODEL=opus EFFORT=medium
|
||
engines/claude.sh" --rounds 3`, on 2026-09-30, after the guidance
|
||
learnt to name records that answer records (`about`), members-only
|
||
needs (`door` + `enters_as`), a group contact, and `grants` as the
|
||
moment of membership. The plan came out of round 1 and passed the
|
||
builder's checks; rounds 2 and 3 were not needed.
|
||
|
||
Side by side with the hand-written `plans/building-permits.yaml`
|
||
(2026-09-25, before any of those existed):
|
||
|
||
| | hand-written | Opus, this run |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| needs / groups / doors | 14 / 5 / 2 | 14 / 4 / 2 |
|
||
| needs `about` another | – | 3: objection, appeal, exemption, all about the application |
|
||
| `grants` | – | firm approval lists the firm in `approved_firms` |
|
||
| members-only (`door` + `enters_as`) | – | 3: a firm's application, completion certificate, temporary permission, for `approved_firms` |
|
||
| `deadlines` | – | 4, incl. the six-week hearing |
|
||
| public lists | 6 | 3 |
|
||
| `reached_from` | 3 | 3 |
|
||
|
||
So the new lines were taken up unprompted, and for the right things: an
|
||
objection belongs to the application it objects to, and a firm files
|
||
because it was approved. What Opus did not carry over from the intake:
|
||
the counter's own needs (`log-counter-enquiry`, `case-status-enquiry`),
|
||
which two personas name; and the external agencies as a group of their
|
||
own, folded into the case officers instead.
|
||
|
||
## What the run found in the tools
|
||
|
||
- **The builder wrote one answer page per answering need**, at the
|
||
same path, so with three needs about the application only the last
|
||
survived and iris found no path for the others. A record's page now
|
||
holds one form per need about it (`words[...]["forms"][need]`).
|
||
- **iris counted the carried record id as effort.** An objection form
|
||
that carries the application's id was one field over its budget.
|
||
iris main (with portal v0.5.7) counts what a person fills in.
|
||
|
||
With both fixed the site lints clean but for the two personas above:
|
||
37 questions, 15 aggregates, 225 access rules, 12 of 14 needs met.
|
||
Not built with words, not deployed.
|