Files
portal/runs/permits-plan-2026-09-30/README.md
T

44 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Vestmark kommune, planned again by Opus after the September additions
`portal-trainer plan --intake intakes/building-permits.yaml --personas
intakes/building-permits-personas.yaml --llm "MODEL=opus EFFORT=medium
engines/claude.sh" --rounds 3`, on 2026-09-30, after the guidance
learnt to name records that answer records (`about`), members-only
needs (`door` + `enters_as`), a group contact, and `grants` as the
moment of membership. The plan came out of round 1 and passed the
builder's checks; rounds 2 and 3 were not needed.
Side by side with the hand-written `plans/building-permits.yaml`
(2026-09-25, before any of those existed):
| | hand-written | Opus, this run |
|---|---|---|
| needs / groups / doors | 14 / 5 / 2 | 14 / 4 / 2 |
| needs `about` another | – | 3: objection, appeal, exemption, all about the application |
| `grants` | – | firm approval lists the firm in `approved_firms` |
| members-only (`door` + `enters_as`) | – | 3: a firm's application, completion certificate, temporary permission, for `approved_firms` |
| `deadlines` | – | 4, incl. the six-week hearing |
| public lists | 6 | 3 |
| `reached_from` | 3 | 3 |
So the new lines were taken up unprompted, and for the right things: an
objection belongs to the application it objects to, and a firm files
because it was approved. What Opus did not carry over from the intake:
the counter's own needs (`log-counter-enquiry`, `case-status-enquiry`),
which two personas name; and the external agencies as a group of their
own, folded into the case officers instead.
## What the run found in the tools
- **The builder wrote one answer page per answering need**, at the
same path, so with three needs about the application only the last
survived and iris found no path for the others. A record's page now
holds one form per need about it (`words[...]["forms"][need]`).
- **iris counted the carried record id as effort.** An objection form
that carries the application's id was one field over its budget.
iris main (with portal v0.5.7) counts what a person fills in.
With both fixed the site lints clean but for the two personas above:
37 questions, 15 aggregates, 225 access rules, 12 of 14 needs met.
Not built with words, not deployed.