Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Sonnet 5 c07f8c880d Drop the investor concern entirely
Lint and reload / lint (push) Successful in 2s
Lint and reload / reload (push) Successful in 0s
It was a worked example of the empathic pattern, not a feature: every
alternative should be empathic, informative, and helpful - information
that gives an answer, not necessarily a path to choose. The pattern
stays (voice rules, README); the investor pages, aggregate, review
alternative, and front-page gateway go. The investors KV bucket and
its test records linger in NATS unreferenced - purge at leisure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Sonnet 5 176e2210a0 README: the voice rules
Lint and reload / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Lint and reload / reload (push) Successful in 0s
The title is the only question; alternatives are bold statements
argued against each other; explain why input is needed, then hand
over the field; never assume the visitor's role - give the concern
its own page and let the question nav surface it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 23:29:53 +02:00
Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Sonnet 5 251fe22c25 README: the runtime's dependencies and the optimal usecase, in order
Lint and reload / lint (push) Successful in 2s
Lint and reload / reload (push) Successful in 1s
Replaces the long-stale schema notes (pre-aggregates, pre-resources,
pre-proposal-loop) with what the repo actually is now: declare a state
graph, give it a way in (submission), a way through (review
transitions), let automations react, and change the system through
itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 22:56:54 +02:00
Bendik Aagaard Lynghaug 5321f70540 Initial content: opener, project, subscribed, applied 2026-07-29 12:51:55 +02:00