portal serve runs a site; portal lint is what iris was; portal plan,
build, report and the rest are what portal-trainer was. One source at
one version, so the three never disagree about what content means.
Both histories are merged in (subtree). The release attaches the bare
binary for a content repo's CI. The trainer's plans, intakes, engines
and reference prompt come along; its runs stay in the old repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GT37Z1Xtfd9pUuQtMTg6Yt
Any text a person reads may be a list, one entry per storyline, every
list the same length. A visitor is given one storyline for the whole
site and reads it on every page and in every mail about their case.
Records and events carry the storyline; GET /report gives counts per
bucket, storyline and state, and nothing else.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GT37Z1Xtfd9pUuQtMTg6Yt
A membership is a case in the built-in portal_memberships bucket:
invited by a desk, a grants, the seed or the responsible pass; active
from the person's first sign-in, when the provider's subject, phone
number or address matches the record; removed by a desk, and invited
again after that. One record per group and person however it was
keyed, and at sign-in every record that matched learns what the
provider verified. The active memberships join the groups claim, so
Cedar sees the same parents as before.
PEOPLE_BACKEND picks Kanidm or memberships; unset, a KANIDM_API_TOKEN
means Kanidm. The NATS access service looks a person's groups up when
a question names them by sub, phone or email and lists none. The
sign-in asks for the phoneNumber scope and reads it from userinfo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GT37Z1Xtfd9pUuQtMTg6Yt
From an empty Kanidm to everyone at their own desk: what in the content
decides who needs an account, the four things Kanidm needs for portal,
the first person, what happens at start, how everyone after comes in
from the desks, what the people who ask the questions can do, and what
each failure looks like.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GT37Z1Xtfd9pUuQtMTg6Yt
Five things a building authority needed and portal could not say,
found by building one and replaying its cases through the engine.
The one that mattered: a submitter could only ever act on a record
nobody had touched. `access.rs` pinned a self_transition's from-state
to `open`, though the runtime had always passed the real state and
asked. So the applicant written to for a missing drawing could not
send it, and nobody could withdraw once anything had happened.
`self_transition` now takes `from: [state, ...]` and compiles one rule
per state; omitted it still means the initial state alone, which is
what every unsubscribe link already meant.
Then the four beside it. A record can belong to another record
(`type: record`, `of:`), with `where: { field, equals }` on a listing
as the other half, so an application's page lists the objections that
name it. A public view can be narrowed to the states worth showing,
so a register that is public by law is public about what was decided
and not about what was withdrawn. A state can grant a group, so an
approval that means membership needs no second step. And a state can
be moved by a clock (`after: { days, to }`, src/deadlines.rs) - held
to the same declared edge as a desk button, firing the same mail,
publishing the same event.
Also: the README is a README again, and everything that was crowding
it is in docs/ - architecture, content reference, state machines,
access, operations.
95 tests, up from 82.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
