The inside of the business reads button labels and nothing else. For
every desk and bucket with two or more buttons, a worker is told what
just happened to a case, in the state's own words, and picks the
button; scored right of total with what each miss was taken for. The
vel's neighbour-help desk scores 2 of 4 and the notice board 1 of 2:
the first numbers a desk has ever had.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The words model can be pointed at a subset of pages (`aggregates.yaml`
for the mails alone) while everything else keeps the words it has.
`rate --repo` rates each mail's prose on its own, LIX and length,
since a person reads a mail with no card around it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
iris now hands a task the cards that lead nowhere as `page` context;
the answerer shows it before the options and the rater before the
cards, and the gutted twin loses it like everything else. The Tomter
Vel plan keeps its four doors and gains the opener, the mails and the
member's own move: flat scored worse and the doors stay.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Work from another session, committed as found (tests green):
- `plan` reads an intake into a plan.yaml (a model decides needs,
stages, forms and budgets; a person reads the result before build).
- Plans gain `doors` (a first question before the forms, when a front
door would carry more than five needs), `groups` with labels that a
select may draw its options from (`options_from: groups`), `private`
fields kept off public pages, `multiple` selects, and `max_fields`
as what the intake said the person will tolerate.
- `card.rs`: an alternative as the visitor meets it, in text, so the
answering visitor and `rate` read the served card, not the heading.
- `rate` reads followup pages from the repo and reports "what happens
next" as not measured rather than zero when it cannot.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01L4jrCgLiKKHAEFuZUJjckH
Readability is counted (LIX), not judged. Understanding is three
yes-or-no questions per persona, with a gutted twin of every page as
the control: an instrument that still says yes to "Option 1, Option 2"
is not measuring the page. Friendliness is a preference between two
versions shown in both orders; a pick that flips with the order counts
as no preference. Page load (options offered, required fields in the
step) flags a page that should be split into a further question or
have fields moved to a later stage.
First run on the generated contractor site, qwen3:8b as the visitor:
control passed on every need; "what happens next" was 0/2 everywhere
and 2/2 everywhere once the page said who reads it and when (LIX 28 to
30); an official-voice control reads LIX 63 against 27. Friendliness
mostly came back "no preference" at two personas per need: directionally
right (never preferred the cold version), too thin to rely on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01L4jrCgLiKKHAEFuZUJjckH
