A site is run by a handful of people: whoever answers for each question
it asks, and whoever works each desk. This is how they get in - from
an empty Kanidm to everyone signed in at their own desk - without
anyone handing out passwords or running an admin tool per person.
The idea in one line: **the content says who is involved, and portal
makes their accounts.** A page names who is responsible for it; a
directory is gated on a group; a desk may invite into groups. Portal
reads that and does the rest at start.
## What you need
- A content repo, and a portal instance running it
([Operations](operations.md) has adding a site).
- A Kanidm of the site's own. Group names below are exactly the ones
the content uses, with no prefix; that is only safe when the Kanidm
serves this site alone.
- Mail: `mail: { from }` in `site.yaml`, and gdo on the host. Without
it accounts are still made, but nobody hears about them.
## 1. Say who is involved, in the content
Three things in the content decide who needs an account:
| content | who | what they get |
|---|---|---|
| `responsible: { name, contact }` on a page | the person answering for that question | an account, and a mail saying they are listed as responsible for asking it |
| `qualifies: styret` on a page or `_section.yaml` | members of that group | the pages and desks under it |
| `invite: { group: kasserer }` on a desk page | the desk's own group | the right to bring people into `kasserer` |
The desk whose group may invite into the most groups is the site's most
privileged one; on a vel that is the board. Portal works that out from
- **At a desk**, whoever may invite fills in a name and an address.
Portal makes the account, adds them to the group, and mails the link.
- **A decision can be the invitation.** A state with `grants: group`
in `aggregates.yaml` puts the person a case is about into that group
when the case arrives there - an approved committee application that
*is* the membership.
- **A new page with a new responsible person** gets them an account at
the next start.
## 6. What the people who ask the questions can do
Signed in, a person a page names as responsible sees a card at the
foot of their own pages to suggest a change. The server checks it is
really them; the suggestion is kept (`portal_edit_suggestions`),
announced (`portal.edits.suggested`), and mailed to the site's inbox
with them as reply-to, so answering it answers them.
Their group can also be the way into other tools. The vel's
`redaktor` group signs in to the project Gitea with the same account:
a second OAuth2 client scoped to that group alone.
## When it does not work
| what you see | why |
|---|---|
| an invite fails with `403` setting `mail` | a portal before 0.5.4 set the address in a second call; the onboarding account may create but not modify |
| an invite fails with `404` adding to a group | the group is not managed by `portal-onboarding`: `group set-entry-manager <group> portal-onboarding` |
| `Item not found` setting the login page's name or logo | those are system settings only `admin` may change, not `idm_admin` - or the CLI and server versions differ |
| accounts are made but nobody is mailed | `site.yaml` has no `mail.from`, or gdo is not running on the host |
| someone responsible never got a mail | they already had an account (they are only added to `RESPONSIBLE_GROUP`), or their `contact` is not an email address |
| the first person was invited twice | it cannot be, per address and group; changing `SEED_ADMIN_EMAIL` or `SEED_GROUP` invites the new pair |