A ninth gap in the same vein — a placement at 29° of any sign is a
well-known, unambiguous astrological concept (urgency/culmination
themes) that needed nothing beyond the longitude already computed for
every placement. Considered and deliberately skipped void-of-course
Moon in this same pass: it needs real-world validation data (known VOC
windows) I don't have access to, and getting timing advice wrong is a
different risk class than a decorative label — astrologers actually
use VOC for real decisions. Critical degree has no such risk: it's
pure, unambiguous arithmetic on data already computed.
Test-driven against the real edge case (30.0° must read as 0° Taurus,
not critical, not as "still near a 29 boundary" from a sloppy
implementation checking the wrong modulus).
Shown as a "· critical degree" note on the affected placement's degree
label (planets and angles both), plus added to the glyph legend from
the previous commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
