Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Sonnet 5
309e3b43df
- The page title is the only question anywhere; alternative and feature names are now statements in our voice. Where we need input we say why (the reply is personal, software lands somewhere, a proposal is a stance), then hand over the field. - The opening question's alternatives become the statements we'd like visitors to get behind: "Good software begins with a clear argument", "Attention is earned", "Capital needs reasons", "Work happens through dialogue, not tickets". - followup: true on the five post-submission pages keeps them out of the question nav until the visitor actually carries a chain. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
18 lines
545 B
YAML
18 lines
545 B
YAML
id: /invested
|
|
route: ^/invested
|
|
followup: true
|
|
name: What happens now?
|
|
description: >
|
|
Your interest is on its way to a real inbox. Expect a considered,
|
|
personal reply — not a pitch deck on autopilot.
|
|
alternatives:
|
|
- name: In short
|
|
description: ""
|
|
features:
|
|
- name: We read it
|
|
description: In full, before we write back.
|
|
- name: Dialogue before commitment
|
|
description: >
|
|
We'll want to understand each other properly first — what
|
|
you're looking for, and whether we're actually it.
|