Drop the investor concern entirely

It was a worked example of the empathic pattern, not a feature: every
alternative should be empathic, informative, and helpful - information
that gives an answer, not necessarily a path to choose. The pattern
stays (voice rules, README); the investor pages, aggregate, review
alternative, and front-page gateway go. The investors KV bucket and
its test records linger in NATS unreferenced - purge at leisure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

README.md

@@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ entirely in this repo, in this order:
    transitions:
 
    ```yaml
-   - bucket: investors
+   - bucket: partners        # illustrative
      initial: open
      states:
-       open: { event: expressed_interest }
+       open: { event: introduced }
        in_dialogue: { event: entered_dialogue }
        committed: { event: committed }
        declined: { event: declined }
@@ -68,12 +68,13 @@ entirely in this repo, in this order:
    `record_as` naming the bucket:
 
    ```yaml
-   - name: I want to invest
-     action: /invested          # thank-you page to advance to
-     consequence: [Open the conversation]   # the submit button's label
-     record_as: investors
+   - name: A bold statement to get behind
+     action: /thanks            # follow-up page to advance to
+     consequence: [The button's label]
+     record_as: partners
      features:
-       - name: Who are you?
+       - name: A way to reach you
+         description: Say why the input is needed, then hand over the field.
          requirements:
            - name: email
              label: Email
@@ -90,13 +91,13 @@ entirely in this repo, in this order:
    every selection at once:
 
    ```yaml
-   - name: Investors
+   - name: Partners
      action: /review
      consequence: [Confirm]
      features:
        - name: ""
          resource:
-           source: { kind: kv, bucket: investors }
+           source: { kind: kv, bucket: partners }
            requires_group: owners
            transitions:
              - { to: in_dialogue, label: Open dialogue }

aggregates.yaml

@@ -54,19 +54,6 @@ aggregates:
       prospect: [client, past_client]
       client: [past_client]
 
-  - bucket: investors
-    initial: open
-    states:
-      open: { event: expressed_interest }
-      in_dialogue: { event: entered_dialogue }
-      committed: { event: committed }
-      declined: { event: declined }
-      divested: { event: divested }
-    transitions:
-      open: [in_dialogue, declined]
-      in_dialogue: [committed, declined]
-      committed: [divested]
-
 # Proposals to change this very repo - the question architecture
 # dogfooding its own development. Approval hands off to an n8n
 # automation that opens a PR against this repo (see the infrastructure

questions/index.yaml

@@ -66,14 +66,6 @@ alternatives:
             label: Email
             type: email
 
-  - name: Capital needs reasons
-    description: >
-      Whoever manages it is accountable for them — enthusiasm doesn't
-      qualify. Ours are written down, as qualities you can test
-      against your own.
-    action: /invest
-    consequence: [Read our reasons]
-
   - name: Work happens through dialogue, not tickets
     description: >
       What you bring shapes what gets built. We onboard collaborators

questions/invest.yaml

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-id: /invest
-route: ^/invest
-name: How do we invest in uhhm?
-description: >
-  If you manage capital, enthusiasm isn't a reason — you're accountable
-  for the qualities an investment actually has. Here are ours, written
-  down, and the shortest path to testing them against your own.
-alternatives:
-  - name: What a good investment should be able to show
-    description: ""
-    features:
-      - name: State you can audit
-        icon: lucide:git-commit-horizontal
-        description: >
-          Every applicant, client, project, and investor here is
-          tracked state with a durable event history — not a
-          spreadsheet someone remembers to update. What we claim about
-          the organisation, the system can show.
-      - name: A focus that doesn't wander
-        icon: lucide:compass
-        description: >
-          Distributed communication architecture is the mandate. Work
-          that doesn't serve it doesn't get taken on — including work
-          that pays.
-      - name: Growth by dialogue, not headcount
-        icon: lucide:messages-square
-        description: >
-          People, clients, and changes to the system itself all arrive
-          through the same deliberate, reviewable loop. Slow on
-          purpose, cheap to run, hard to bloat.
-
-  - name: Test us
-    description: >
-      A few lines about what you're looking for opens the dialogue —
-      commitments only ever follow real conversation.
-    action: /invested
-    consequence: [Open the conversation]
-    record_as: investors
-    encouragements:
-      - Serious inquiries get a serious answer.
-    features:
-      - name: A way to reach you
-        description: Dialogue needs a counterpart — the reply is personal.
-        requirements:
-          - name: name
-            label: Name
-          - name: email
-            label: Email
-            type: email
-      - name: Your criteria
-        description: >
-          We answer against what you're actually accountable for — so
-          state it plainly.
-        requirements:
-          - name: motivation
-            label: Your criteria for a good investment
-            type: textarea

questions/invested.yaml

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-id: /invested
-route: ^/invested
-followup: true
-name: What happens now?
-description: >
-  Your interest is on its way to a real inbox. Expect a considered,
-  personal reply — not a pitch deck on autopilot.
-alternatives:
-  - name: In short
-    description: ""
-    features:
-      - name: We read it
-        description: In full, before we write back.
-      - name: Dialogue before commitment
-        description: >
-          We'll want to understand each other properly first — what
-          you're looking for, and whether we're actually it.

questions/review.yaml

@@ -32,33 +32,6 @@ alternatives:
               to: departed
               label: Depart
 
-  - name: Investors
-    description: ""
-    action: /review
-    consequence: [Confirm]
-    features:
-      - name: ""
-        description: ""
-        resource:
-          source:
-            kind: kv
-            bucket: investors
-          requires_group: owners
-          transitions:
-            - to: in_dialogue
-              label: Open dialogue
-            - to: declined
-              label: Decline
-            - from: in_dialogue
-              to: committed
-              label: Commit
-            - from: in_dialogue
-              to: declined
-              label: Decline
-            - from: committed
-              to: divested
-              label: Divest
-
   - name: Organizations
     description: >
       Client relationships as tracked state — advanced as the