Speak to the applicant's actual concern, not just the process
Lint and reload / lint-and-reload (push) Successful in 3s

"A person reads it" reassures about process (a human, not a bot) but
never answers what an applicant actually wants to know: does what I
specifically bring matter here? Rewrote to say that directly, and
named how it gets used once they're in - dialogue-centered
development, not a queue of pre-decided tasks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bendik Aagaard Lynghaug
2026-08-06 12:57:21 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Sonnet 5
parent 1b709d2a67
commit a9eaca6b78
+13 -4
View File
@@ -2,14 +2,23 @@ id: /applied
route: ^/applied
name: What happens now that you've applied?
description: >
Someone here will read this personally and write back. A match earns
a personal invitation, extended by hand.
We're not filling a seat — we're looking for exactly what you bring
that we don't already have. Someone here will read this personally
and write back.
alternatives:
- name: Thanks — it's in front of us
description: ""
features:
- name: A person reads it
description: Every decision is made by someone who was actually there.
- name: We need your specific angle
description: >
Not a generic fit — the particular thing you're good at, the
problem you'd actually notice, the take nobody else here
has. That's what we're reading for.
- name: Work happens through dialogue, not tickets
description: >
What you bring shapes what gets built, in an ongoing back
-and-forth — not a queue of pre-decided tasks handed down to
execute.
- name: You receive a personal invitation
description: >
A match earns you a real key — access, a measure of