Files
questions/README.md
T

320 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# questions
Content for the [`portal`](https://project.uhhm.no/uhhm/portal) runtime
at [uhhm.no](https://uhhm.no) — every page, form, review desk, and
state machine on the site is declared in this repo's YAML, kept apart
from the Rust so a content change never needs a rebuild. The intent:
the person asking a question is only responsible for *asking it well*
declaring the context it's valid in, the alternatives a visitor can
choose, what each alternative needs to be answerable, and where an
answer's story goes next. The runtime handles everything else.
## How it runs
Portal loads every `questions/*.yaml` file (one page each) plus
`aggregates.yaml` (the state graphs) from this repo over Gitea's
contents API — at boot, and again on every push here: this repo's CI
lints the content with portal's own `question_lint` binary, then
publishes a NATS message that makes every running portal instance
re-fetch and atomically swap the new content in. Bad content never
replaces good: a failed lint stops the push's reload, and a running
instance keeps serving its last-good content even if a reload slips
past.
What the runtime provides underneath:
- **Portal** (Rust/Leptos) — renders pages, takes submissions, enforces
the state graphs.
- **NATS** — every submission and decision publishes to
`portal.answers.submitted`; JetStream holds the durable per-record
event log and the KV buckets pages read.
- **Gitea** — hosts this repo, serves the content API, runs the lint
CI, and gates the proposal loop's merges (branch protection on
`main` requires the lint check).
- **Kanidm** — identity; a page or resource naming a group
(`qualifies`, `requires_group`) is gated to signed-in members of it.
- **n8n** — automations subscribed to the NATS subject act on specific
decisions (send the newsletter, onboard an invited applicant, commit
an approved development proposal).
## This repo runs the instance
Besides the content, this repo owns the uhhm.no portal instance
itself. `.gitea/workflows/deploy.yml` pins the portal version:
```yaml
env:
PORTAL_RELEASE: v0.2.3 # a release tag on uhhm/portal
```
Upgrading (or downgrading) portal is bumping that line and pushing —
the workflow downloads the pinned release artifact, ships it, rewrites
the instance env from this repo's Actions variables/secrets, restarts
`app@uhhm-portal`, and refreshes the Caddy route. Nothing else
deploys this site; a push to the portal repo only publishes a new
version for repos like this one to opt into.
Day to day you rarely touch it: content edits (any `*.yaml` here)
hot-reload without a deploy, and the deploy workflow only triggers on
changes to itself (or a manual run from the Actions tab).
## The optimal usecase, in order
A full concern — say, tracking a new kind of actor — is stood up
entirely in this repo, in this order:
1. **Declare the state graph** (`aggregates.yaml`). Name a bucket,
its states, the event each state is entered by, and the legal
transitions:
```yaml
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
- bucket: partners # illustrative
initial: open
states:
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
open: { event: introduced }
in_dialogue: { event: entered_dialogue }
committed: { event: committed }
declined: { event: declined }
transitions:
open: [in_dialogue, declined]
in_dialogue: [committed, declined]
```
This graph is the authority: the runtime refuses any transition the
graph doesn't declare, no matter who asks. A bucket with no entry
here still works as plain storage — declare a graph when the
records have a lifecycle worth enforcing.
2. **Give it a way in** — a submission alternative on some page, with
`record_as` naming the bucket:
```yaml
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
- name: A bold statement to get behind
action: /thanks # follow-up page to advance to
consequence: [The button's label]
record_as: partners
features:
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
- name: A way to reach you
description: Say why the input is needed, then hand over the field.
requirements:
- name: email
label: Email
type: email
```
Each submission becomes a record in `open` (the graph's `initial`),
hashed into the visitor's answer chain, logged as the record's
first event, and published on NATS.
3. **Give it a way through** — a review alternative reading the bucket
back, offering the graph's transitions as buttons. `from` scopes a
button to rows actually in that state; one shared button confirms
every selection at once:
```yaml
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
- name: Partners
action: /review
consequence: [Confirm]
features:
- name: ""
resource:
2026-08-12 23:33:53 +02:00
source: { kind: kv, bucket: partners }
requires_group: owners
transitions:
- { to: in_dialogue, label: Open dialogue }
- { to: declined, label: Decline }
- { from: in_dialogue, to: committed, label: Commit }
```
4. **Let automations react** (optional). Every decision publishes
`question_id` + the transition's `label` on NATS — an n8n workflow
gates on those two strings and does the rest (see the
infrastructure repo's `n8n-workflows/`). Rename a page or a label
and its workflow must be updated in lockstep.
5. **Change the system through itself.** `/develop/proposal` takes a
proposed replacement for any content file (the `questions/` tree,
`aggregates.yaml`, or `site.yaml` — nothing else is in scope) —
from a person, or eventually a locally-run model, through the same
public form. The submission itself becomes a branch and a draft
pull request at once (n8n "Portal: proposal received"), so lint
reports on it immediately and the submitter gets one
acknowledgement mail if they left an address. An owner approves it
on `/develop`; approval un-drafts the PR and merges it once the
same lint that gates every human push passes ("Portal: commit
approved development proposal"). Nothing merges on autopilot. The
alternative is `disabled: true` while this loop is being finished —
announced, not yet open.
2026-08-12 23:29:53 +02:00
## Voice
The rules every page here follows:
- **The title is the only question.** A page asks one thing — its
`name`. Nothing below it asks anything.
- **Alternatives draw people in.** Each one suggests a real path a
visitor could take — a position to get behind or a thing to do next,
in our voice, never the visitor's presumed voice and never a
question. A category label ("Our Composition") is not an
alternative; "Follow the build as it lands" is.
2026-08-12 23:29:53 +02:00
- **Explain why, then hand over the field.** Where input is needed,
the feature's name and description state the reason ("the reply is
personal — it needs an address"), and labels are nouns, not
questions.
- **Don't bucket people into roles.** We join the visitor's narrative
in the simplest way: statements they can get behind and information
that gives them an answer — not segments to self-select into. The
question nav (every page's footer) surfaces all questions the
current visitor qualifies for, so nothing depends on front-page
space; post-submission pages (nested non-index files, or `followup: true`) only join
the nav once the visitor holds an answer chain.
2026-08-12 23:29:53 +02:00
## Schema quick reference
The exact structs live in portal's `src/content.rs`; the shape:
```
Question id (derived from the file's path - see routing
below - declare only to override), name,
description, qualifies (Kanidm group gate),
requires_chain (question ref the visitor's ?chain=
lineage must end at), followup (nav-hidden until
the visitor carries a chain; inferred from the
tree when unset), event {starts, duration, place}
(announced page - see below), responsible
{name, contact}, alternatives[]
2026-08-25 20:25:49 +02:00
Alternative name, description, action, disabled (announced,
not yet takeable), consequence[label],
encouragements[], images[] (1 = banner, 2+ = card deck),
record_as (bucket), self_transition {bucket, to, label},
features[]
Feature name, description, color (CSS accent), icon
(Iconify name, e.g. lucide:star), requirements[],
resource
Requirement name, label, type, optional, multiple, placeholder,
accept (file), resource + id_field (select options),
bind {field, param, resource} (load this field's
value from a resource whenever the named sibling
changes - {param} templates into a url source's path),
relay (gesture only - ws(s):// redoal-relay URL)
ResourceSpec source (kv | gitea_starred | gitea_org_repos |
gitea_releases | url),
key, public, requires_group, transitions[{from, to, label}],
2026-08-25 20:05:22 +02:00
jq (reshape filter), empty (text when the
resource yields nothing; default "Nothing here yet.")
```
Requirement `type`: `text` (default), `textarea`, `email`, `tel`,
`select`, `file`, `prosekit` (rich text), `gesture` (draw a stroke on
a canvas; submits `{points, key}` - with `relay` set it announces the
stroke to a redoal-relay and shows echoes of similar strokes; mark it
`optional: true`, hidden inputs skip HTML required-validation), or any
HTML input type.
A repo may also carry an optional `site.yaml` at its root (sibling of
`aggregates.yaml`) declaring instance branding: `title`, `wordmark`
(image URL), and the landing page's `hero`:
```yaml
hero:
kind: module # plain (default) | module
module: hero.js # repo-relative path, served by portal at /site/hero.js
```
A `module` hero is a JavaScript module this repo ships, exporting
`mount(container) -> handle` where the handle has `stop()`. Portal
serves it same-origin (Gitea's raw endpoint sends no CORS headers, so
`/site/<path>` proxies any plain-segment path from the repo), starts
it at HTML parse time, adopts it on hydration, and stops it on
navigation. Everything visual is the module's - it builds its own DOM
inside `.hero-piece` and may inject its own stylesheet, including
rules for the `.hero-module` header itself. uhhm's `hero.js` is the
YES canvas piece; redoal's is the sine-swings band. Absent file =
plain hero, portal's `SITE_NAME`, `/wordmark.svg`.
`self_transition` is the anonymous, single-record counterpart to a
review resource's transitions — fireable by whoever holds one specific
record's `?chain=` link plus its matching email (the unsubscribe
pattern).
**Announced pages.** A question carrying an `event:` block
```yaml
event:
starts: 2026-09-12T18:00:00+02:00 # RFC 3339, with offset
duration: 3h # m / h / d, e.g. "1d 6h"
place: Galleri X, Oslo # optional, shown verbatim
```
is announced in the header of every page (name, when, "in 3 days")
while its window is open, instead of listed in the footer nav. The
page itself is an ordinary question - RSVP, directions, whatever its
alternatives say. When the window closes the page turns into a
followup (only visitors carrying an answer chain still see it) and
portal moves the page's record in the runtime-owned `portal_events`
bucket from `announced` to `awaiting_summary`, publishing that on
`portal.answers.submitted` like any decision (alternative "Summary
due") - the "post what happened" task. `/review`'s "Announced pages"
desk reads that bucket; **Posted what happened** closes the task.
Lint warns when pages carry `event:` but nothing reads
`portal_events`.
**Attended buckets** (lint-enforced): every `record_as` bucket must be
read by some `kv` resource in this repo (a desk or listing) — or its
`aggregates.yaml` entry must carry `attended_by: <who/what consumes
it>` naming the automation that does. A bucket nothing reads fails
lint, so no publicly collected answer can land where no one will ever
see it.
## Routing: the tree is the router
The `questions/` directory tree is the URL tree — `index.yaml` names
its directory, everything else appends its stem:
```
questions/
index.yaml /
applied.yaml /applied
develop/
index.yaml /develop
proposal.yaml /develop/proposal
proposed.yaml /develop/proposed
review/
_section.yaml (not a page - defaults for the directory)
index.yaml /review
[record].yaml /review/<any value>
```
- `id:` is derived from the path; declaring it still wins (legacy),
with a lint warning when it disagrees.
- `action:` and `requires_chain:` take relative refs — `proposed`
names a sibling, `../x` climbs, `/x` is absolute. A directory is a
self-contained flow: `git mv` renames every internal edge with it.
- Files nested in a subdirectory infer `followup: true` unless
they're the directory's `index.yaml` — declare `followup: false`
on a nested page that should stay in the nav. Top-level files keep
the flat-repo default (not a followup).
- `_section.yaml` applies `qualifies`, `requires_chain`, and
`responsible` to every page at or below its directory (nearest
ancestor wins; a page's own declaration always overrides). A URL
prefix is a trust boundary.
- Any other `_`-prefixed file is skipped entirely — drafts live in
the tree without being served.
- `[name].yaml` is a dynamic page: it serves every `/dir/<value>`,
with the segment substituted into `{name}` placeholders in the
page's resource `key`s (`/review/<chain-hash>` shows that one
record). One per directory; never in the nav; not a valid `action`
target.
- `requires_chain: <ref>` gates a page on provenance instead of
identity: the visitor's `?chain=` lineage must verifiably end at an
answer to the referenced question, otherwise the page renders a
pointer there instead of its alternatives.
## Adding a page
Drop a YAML file where its URL should live (`questions/foo.yaml` →
`/foo`, `questions/flow/step.yaml` → `/flow/step`), reference it from
some alternative's `action`, push. Lint runs, portal hot-reloads, the
page is live — no registration, no deploy. Or propose it through
`/develop/proposal` and let the loop do the pushing.