Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Fable 5.1
255aeb4f4b
Work from another session, committed as found (tests green): - `plan` reads an intake into a plan.yaml (a model decides needs, stages, forms and budgets; a person reads the result before build). - Plans gain `doors` (a first question before the forms, when a front door would carry more than five needs), `groups` with labels that a select may draw its options from (`options_from: groups`), `private` fields kept off public pages, `multiple` selects, and `max_fields` as what the intake said the person will tolerate. - `card.rs`: an alternative as the visitor meets it, in text, so the answering visitor and `rate` read the served card, not the heading. - `rate` reads followup pages from the repo and reports "what happens next" as not measured rather than zero when it cannot. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01L4jrCgLiKKHAEFuZUJjckH
Tomter Vel, the whole card worded, scored by a visitor who reads the whole card
Same plan as the day before (plans/tomtervel.yaml, 11 needs behind
four doors, with nabohjelp), rebuilt after the builder learned to
fill every part of a card and the scorers learned to read it. Claude
Sonnet writing the words, 294 s for 27 pages, verifier green by
construction. Visitor: qwen3:8b, one task per call, shown each option
as portal renders it. This build is what vel.klingenbergbygg.no
serves from 2026-09-23.
| Visitor could read | 2026-09-22 build (heading + description) | This build (whole card) |
|---|---|---|
| Headings and descriptions | 30 of 40 | 32 of 40 |
| Headings only | 28 of 40 | 29 of 40 |
Two more routed right with descriptions, one more on headings alone. Not a large move, and the headings-only figure says why: the front door's four door headings still do most of the damage. "Si din mening eller gi en hånd" took two traffic reports, two playground reports, a member with a new email and a waffle volunteer on headings alone. The card cannot help a visitor who only reads the heading, and the door headings are the plan's weakest words.
What the card does do shows in rate: with the whole card shown,
"where" (do you know where you are, who this is for, and what the
button does) is 2 of 2 on every page, and "asked" is 2 of 2 on every
form page. The two context sections the plan supplies, "Hva skjer
videre" and "Hvem ser dette", are what makes "next" 2 of 2 on the
form pages.
One instrument note: "where" fails its control on three pages, where the gutted twin (which keeps the page's question) still got a yes. A question like "Hva har du sett i nabolaget som ikke er som det skal?" tells a visitor where they are on its own. Fair, and it means "where" is partly a property of the page question, not only the cards.
A card, as built (playground report, /melde-fra):
- Få fikset noe som er ødelagt: Er noe på lekeplassen eller stien ødelagt eller farlig? Fortell oss hvor og hva, så tar lekeplasskomiteen tak i det.
- Button: Meld fra. Det holder med noen få ord, så ser komiteen på det så fort de kan.
- [wrench] Hva skjer videre: Meldingen går til lekeplasskomiteen, som tar tak i saken og utbedrer skaden.
- [hammer] Hvem ser dette: Lekeplasskomiteen leser det du sender inn; til det haster kan du nå styret på post@tomtervel.no.
- [construction] Meld fra om skade: Beskriv hva du så og hvor det er. Asks for: Hvor er det?; Hva har du sett? e.g. Løs planke i klatrestativet.