Three seeds over the building authority's front door, then three more
over a variant where the two bare needs became doors of their own.
The diagnosis held: six of the eight front-door misroutes went to the
appeal, a concrete sentence standing among abstract categories, which
collected everyone with any sort of grievance whatever it was about.
Behind a door of its own it collected none.
The site got no better for it - 77.3% against 80.0%, inside the spread.
Two offers went from findable to hidden: the firm whose insurance
certificate had lapsed found "to be on the list, and then to file
without asking again" as a sentence on the front door, and fails every
seed once it is behind a door called "Work as a firm".
So the leak was not costing what it looked like it was costing, and the
rewrite is rejected on measurement. The mixed front door stays.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
