Bendik Aagaard LynghaugandClaude Opus 5
3e1c299490
Three seeds over the building authority's front door, then three more over a variant where the two bare needs became doors of their own. The diagnosis held: six of the eight front-door misroutes went to the appeal, a concrete sentence standing among abstract categories, which collected everyone with any sort of grievance whatever it was about. Behind a door of its own it collected none. The site got no better for it - 77.3% against 80.0%, inside the spread. Two offers went from findable to hidden: the firm whose insurance certificate had lapsed found "to be on the list, and then to file without asking again" as a sentence on the front door, and fails every seed once it is behind a door called "Work as a firm". So the leak was not costing what it looked like it was costing, and the rewrite is rejected on measurement. The mixed front door stays. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
26 lines
2.5 KiB
JSON
26 lines
2.5 KiB
JSON
{"id":"garage-owner@/","choice":"Want to build","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"garage-owner@/want-to-build","choice":"to hear what we will allow before paying an architect","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"shop-to-flats@/","choice":"Want to build","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"shop-to-flats@/want-to-build","choice":"permission to build it, and to know where the case stands","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"too-close-to-boundary@/","choice":"Want to build","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"too-close-to-boundary@/want-to-build","choice":"to be allowed it anyway, with reasons on the record","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"neighbour-view@/","choice":"Building near me","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"neighbour-view@/building-near-me","choice":"what they think on the record, and answered in the decision","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"neighbour-parking@/","choice":"Building near me","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"neighbour-parking@/building-near-me","choice":"what they think on the record, and answered in the decision","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"refused-applicant@/","choice":"the decision looked at again, by us and then by the board","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"neighbour-appeals@/","choice":"the decision looked at again, by us and then by the board","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"board-member@/","choice":"the decision looked at again, by us and then by the board","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"firm-wants-certificate@/","choice":"Want to build","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"firm-wants-certificate@/want-to-build","choice":"the certificate that lets the building be used","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"wants-to-move-in@/","choice":"the decision looked at again, by us and then by the board","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"wants-to-move-in@/want-to-build","choice":"the certificate that lets the building be used","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"something-behind-fence@/","choice":"Building near me","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"something-behind-fence@/building-near-me","choice":"us to go and look, and to hear that we did","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"owner-explains@/","choice":"Building near me","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"owner-explains@/building-near-me","choice":"to be told where it actually stands","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"new-firm@/","choice":"to be on the list, and then to file without asking again","confidence":1.0}
|
|
{"id":"firm-insurance-lapsed@/","choice":"to be on the list, and then to file without asking again","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"where-is-my-case@/","choice":"Building near me","confidence":0.95}
|
|
{"id":"where-is-my-case@/building-near-me","choice":"to be told where it actually stands","confidence":0.95}
|