runs: the friendliness judge passes a positive control

Live vel front door against a cold, bureaucratic twin: friendlier 9
of 10 to the live page, none to the twin, both orders. So the earlier
no-preference between the live doors and the rejected rewrite was a
verdict, not blindness; and judged clarity and measured routing are
different things.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bendik Aagaard Lynghaug
2026-09-24 07:50:52 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Fable 5.1
parent fd785288a4
commit 1df710f32f
49 changed files with 5451 additions and 0 deletions
+8
View File
@@ -349,6 +349,14 @@ model; and a first version that offered every button of the bucket,
not the row's, scored the same desks 17 of 26 and sent a rewrite
chasing an instrument fault. A desk that scores full marks has labels
a stranger to the business could press right.
`prefer` has a positive control on record
(`runs/tomtervel-opener-2026-09-23`, "The friendliness judge"): the
live vel front door against a bureaucratic twin, friendlier 9 of 10
to the live page and 0 to the twin. A pair that comes back "no
preference" throughout is alike in tone, not an instrument that
cannot see; and the rejected door rewrite that was judged clearer on
5 of 10 needs routed worse across three seeds, so clarity as judged
and routing as measured are different things, and routing decides.
## Measured so far
**Generated: a building contractor** (`runs/contractor-2026-09-21/`),