From 18ab8099ac45feaa92951cd40e3a5fa229fd914f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "A (from Sicily)" Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:49:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Updates Cycle.js implementation details Cycle.js supports all kind of streams related libraries but it's now built using `xstream`(http://staltz.com/xstream/) which is not that heavy (nos as heavy as RxJS). --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 4eac6ab..f26bb31 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ give you my opinions directly. Ready? Here goes: neat. - __cycle:__ `cycle`'s pretty good - unlike most frameworks it lays out a clear architecture which helps with reasoning about it. That said, it's built on - `virtual-dom` and `RxJS` which are a bit heavy for my taste. `choo` works + `virtual-dom` and `xstream` which are a bit heavy for my taste. `choo` works pretty well for FRP style programming, but something like [inu][inu] might be an interesting alternative. - __vue:__ like `cycle`, `vue` is pretty good. But it also uses tech that